florida-court-police-power-search-phones

Persons accused of a crime which involved the use of their smartphone and makes use of the Fifth Amendment as a scapegoat from incrimination will find the rule not binding as the Florida Court recently had its power revoked.

For years, the Fifth Amendment had not just been the protector of the falsely-accused but also of verified suspects as well who, by protection of the laws, get away with a crime committed against the law itself and towards others. A resistance that is backed by the US constitution’s laws against self-incrimination.

But as violators have now also gone high-tech by perpetrating their misdeeds, often with the use of their privately-owned mobile phones, passcode pose as a barrier for any possible accusation by prohibiting responding police immediate access to the proof.

Like other instances where the Fifth Amendment is binding, the culprit, however, is not compelled to give out his passcode which may result to the feared for “self-incrimination.”

RelatedConsumer advocate groups accuse Google as a ‘serial privacy violator’

This is, however, all changed as Florida Court of Appeal’s Second District had reversed a decision from a former trial judge of a state’s motion to obligate perpetrators of handing out their passcodes under warrant.

phone-security

A Case of Voyeurism

In fact, not too long ago, there had been a serious case of voyeurism which happened in the confined space of a store where the accused was caught red-handed slipping his iPhone under a woman’s skirt.

The victim itself was the primary witness to the perpetration and, corollary, the violation of her rights.

When confronted of what the suspect is doing, he claimed to have dropped his phone thus resulting to the event of it slipping under the woman’s skirt and was just consequently intended on picking it up.

Not believing the mentioned story, the victim cried for help that which had the suspect running.

READ: The U.S. Government is now asking for social media info from foreign travellers

But the victim is not the sole witness to the misdeed. The store’s surveillance camera had everything recorded by the second which corroborated to the crime. Not only did it caught him on the actual act, but it also got a clear shot of the license plate used on the suspect’s car which led to his eventual arrest.

The suspect was found out to be Aaron Stahl who, by the time of the arrest, was charged of third-degree voyeurism and had claimed his phone, an iPhone 5, incidentally “left” at home.

Intending to get access to his phone, the police went over to Stahl’s house bearing a warrant, only for the suspect to initially withhold consent but later giving in by letting the passcode known.

The issue presented by Stahl has not only stirred the tech-heavy dependent society we are presently living in but also raised certain questions, as per Judge Anthony Black, which ask the “continuing viability of any distinction as technology advances.”

Source: Engadget

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *